In my
previous blog Kata,
what is it Good for, I contrasted how kata are taught and used between
"Traditional" and what I would call "Modern" dojos, such as
the one in which I learnt. Now I want to contrast how students develop in
the different environments.
Traditional
In
traditional dojos, students start off with the basics, improving their
understanding of these and honing their techniques as they progress. Kata or
forms are not introduced until the higher grades, when basics have been
mastered. Techniques are practiced at full speed, not slowly.
There
are no separate Children's or Cadet classes, however from the age of around 8
upwards, children can take part. They do exactly the same syllabus
as the adults, and grade in exactly the same way. Concessions are
not made for the age of the student in what they have to learn.
Regular
grading examinations are held, with students choosing when to participate, not
instructors. Students are allowed to succeed or fail on their own merits.
Concessions
are not generally made for a student's medical or physical limitations, but
might be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Modern
In
modern dojos, as with traditional, students start off with the basics.
However, Kata are introduced at an early stage, along with their
interpretation. Paired and solo drills, along with pad work and
light sparring are also included in lessons.
There
are separate Children's and Adult classes. A typical split might be Shisa
(4-6 years). Junior (7-12 years) and Senior (13 years upwards).
Where I was taught, the Shisa had grades of a kind, but these did not
carry over into Junior. The proper grades started from Junior classes onward.
As
with Traditional dojos, regular grading examinations are held, but these are by
invitation only, when the instructors believe you are ready to grade.
Concessions
are made for medical or physical limitations, including adaptations of drills
or kata where necessary. Some dojos run classes specifically for
people with disabilities and limitations,
Since
Covid-19 especially, some dojos now offer online training to students as
well.
Comparison
It
can be argued that the traditional methods are more rigorous, and certainly
would only allow technically proficient students to progress. They
probably produce good physical conditioning for those that stay the course, and
their training methods and results will be more satisfactory to the purists of
the martial arts world. However, such dojos may not offer much in the way
of financial reward to the dojo owners, and the wastage rate among students is
possibly quite high, due to the demanding standards expected.
The
more modern dojos tend to be more inclusive and attuned to the differing ages
and level of ability of the students, if well run. However, the risk of
more dubious practices is higher than with the traditional dojos, as has been
evidenced in the past with exceptionally young "black belts" being
produced and more than a few, myself included, have scepticism about training
that is non-contact that professes to be a form of karate for example (I personally
exclude the likes of tai-chi from this categorisation where is non-contact
expressly taught for physical well-being, relaxation and meditation).
That
said, anyone who has seen or invested time in working with handicapped students
for example, cannot doubt the efficacy of the confidence building and
improvement in physical well-being that it can offer. Here I would cite
the works of John Johnston’s Adaptive Karate and Les Bubka. But this is
specifically tailored and makes no outrageous promises about what is being
delivered.
In
the middle of this sit most modern dojos, who offer some tailoring to meet the
needs of their students and are not aggressive in their gradings. Some
traditionalists may look down on these dojos, citing their lack of rigour, and
money orientation. However, for the likes of myself, who would never have
taken an interest in martial arts otherwise, they open a preciously closed door
to a level of personal development we would otherwise have never experienced.
Thank
you if you have taken the time to read this.
REY
29/01/2023
A good article I must say. I read it a couple of times. You covered the subject well. When I started some 50 years ago this year the mindset was different. Back then martial arts were all about being strong, fast and combat trained. The sport side of it all was a bit of fun or to pressure test your skills. Today, mainly due to getting paying customers, it is now more softer with the aim of keeping students and making it more available to everyone. Money from students is a big factor in how things have gone now. Hence little kids MA playgroups. That is how the divide between traditional ‘old school’ teachers and MA ‘modern’ teachers came about. Well done. You now seem to know about this?
ReplyDelete